With a Government desperate for revenue to find a ‘pathway’ back to surplus, it comes as little surprise to this office that last night’s Budget contained a pledge by the Government to devote greater resources to the more thorough screening of ABN registrations prior to issuing.
The racing industry should take this pledge very seriously as it is very common for our industry to have ‘hobbyists’ incorrectly applying for GST registration, only to have them revoked down the track, and prior year GST credits refunded, when they become subject to greater ATO scrutiny. Any industry, such as ours, where there is a fine line as to what is a tax business or GST enterprise and what a ‘hobby’ is, will be in the firing line with this increase in ATO compliance activity.
Specifically, the Government will provide $80.2 million dollars in extra funding to strengthen ‘up-front’ checks for issuing of ABNs and encourage the use of AUSkey (the access point for online services of the Australian Business Register).
I will release more details on this measure when the ATO formalise what this greater scrutiny will involve. However, for the time being, I will provide a timely update below as to what the factors the ATO expect from a racing and breeding activity for it to be considered an ‘enterprise’ for GST purposes.
An enterprise, amongst other things, is any activity or series of activities carried on in the form of a “business”. The definition of business “includes any profession, trade, employment, vocation or calling, but does not include occupation as an employee” This is identical to the definition of “business” used in the Tax Act.
1.1 Racing without associated breeding or training activities
The general rule is that racing horses on a ‘stand-alone’ basis, without training or breeding activities, is not accepted as a business. In the reported cases where horse racing was held to be a business, the racing was either associated with concurrent breeding or the taxpayer was also a horse trainer.
To overcome the general rule you must demonstrate that the racing activity:
1.2 Breeding, whether or not combined with racing
The same tests as outlined above apply to taxpayers involved in breeding or breeding and racing horses. Relevant factors would be:
Less relevant factors which may be addressed are:
Operation of the activity via a company or trust structure is not decisive. The activities of racing and breeding may be considered together or separately. In D’Arcy v FC of T 2008 ATC, the AAT held that a taxpayer’s part-time horse breeding activities did not constitute an enterprise for GST purposes.
N.B. The taxpayer need not demonstrate all of these factors, however the existence of a business is enhanced by the activity demonstrating as many of these factors as possible. Whether an activity is a taxation “business” will always be decided as a question of fact.
1.3 An activity ‘in the form of an adventure or concern in the nature of trade’
Of relevance to the racing industry, an ‘enterprise’ can also be an activity ‘in the form of an adventure or concern in the nature of trade’. In a case involving rather exceptional facts (‘Swansea’), a company controlled by an art collector/investor, which over a period of eight years spent $4.8m on artworks but sold only a very small number of lesser works, was held to be carrying on an enterprise where: (1) its activities were apparently systematic and organised on a businesslike basis; and (2) there was an intention to sell, where appropriate, when the circumstances were right.
The principles in Swansea’s case opens up many opportunities for industry participants to register and proper advice should be sought as to its application.
You are welcome to contact me if you wish me to clarify or expand upon any of the matters raised in this article.
End of release
DISCLAIMER: The information contained herein is intended to afford general guidelines on matters of interest. Accordingly, the information in this site is not intended to serve as legal, accounting, or tax advice. Carrazzo Consulting disclaims all warranties with regard to this information, including all implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall Carrazzo Consulting be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortuous action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this information.